Board Thread:General Discussions/@comment-27637441-20160201004741/@comment-25238001-20160208014908

VeerusOfDeath wrote: MarkJira wrote: VeerusOfDeath wrote: MarkJira wrote: VeerusOfDeath wrote: MarkJira wrote: VeerusOfDeath wrote: MarkJira wrote: VeerusOfDeath wrote: MarkJira wrote: VeerusOfDeath wrote: MarkJira wrote: VeerusOfDeath wrote: MarkJira wrote: VeerusOfDeath wrote: MarkJira wrote: Forget it. I'm done being polite. I've come to the conclusion that you are beyond reason and I shan't participate further in this discussion. But I am being reasonable. You're contradicting your own claims, actually.

Six hours ago: "rock isn't orchestral or haunting"

Ten minutes ago: "Electric Funeral is haunting"

If you're gonna be wrong, at least be consistent in your being wrong. I'm not wrong. I know what I'm talking about. You still need to be consistent, whether you're wrong or not I am being consistent. No, you aren't.

Seven hours ago you said "rock isn't orchestral or haunting"

One hour ago, you said "Electric Funeral is haunting".

If you want to make an argument for what you think, fine. You just can't contradict yourself and expect people to agree with you You misunderstood, I said "Electric Funeral" is, not ALL rock songs are. Well, in that post, when you said "rock songs", it was pretty clear that you were referring specifically to Electric Funeral. No, I said "rock songs", NOT "Electric Funeral" You didn't say it explicitly, but I know enough about language to understand that you said it for the purpose of not being redundant. You just don't get it, do you? I could easily say the same for you Hey, I know what I'm talking about. I would disagree I do. If you say so