Talk:King Kong/@comment-26350631-20150427235541

You have it partially wrong. Canonically, the first two Kong Films count as part of the continuity of the Toho series, because they already know there is an island with a giant ape on it somewhere in "King Kong vs Godzilla" because they remember the events of the previous films. They say they only "suspect" there is a giant ape like creature there because the first island sank at the end of "Son of Kong" but the second island of Ferou might contain more of Kong's kind. So I propose the history of the Kong character be combined into one page and not two separate pages! What's even more disrespectful is that RKO made the monster first and whoever runs the wiki changed the Toho one to just "King Kong" and left the original appearances as "King Kong (Universal) as if that one doesn't matter as much even though it's what created the Kong character in the first place! It's stupid to split the 2014 Godzilla and 1954 Godzilla into seperate pages just because they were made by different companies! So why do it here!? The Kong's from the remakes can have their own pages because the events of those films don't share continuity with the Toho monster movies but "King Kong," "Son of Kong," "Japanese King Kong," and "King Kong Appears in Edo," do share continuity so they shouldn't just "not count." Who's with me that we add the information regarding the RKO movies "King Kong," and "Son of Kong," and the information regarding "Japanese King Kong," and "King Kong Appears in Edo," with this one?