Talk:Solgell Island/@comment-25172205-20150807031249/@comment-25172205-20150807205604

I apologize in advance if I'm coming off as being harsh, however this is a matter which shouldn't be solely based on assumptions. I understand where you're coming from that it is a likely conclusion, but this website is read by thousands of people who believe everything that's stated here. Wouldn't you like for this website to have a good reputation and not be known for always giving speculated information? I'm not trying to question your every move, but I really care about this website and I don't want us to fade into a misinformation-filled oblivion.

It is clearly stated in the policy page than speculation in tolerated in any shape or form, and I don't know about you, but I'd like those rules to be followed. Maybe you think I'm being annoying, maybe you think I'm being unreasonable, but just hear me out on this: definitive sources are mandatory when implementing such big facts into our pages. I truly don't care how "likely" of an assumption it is, this page is staying until you can prove to me that Solgell and Monster are the same island.