Board Thread:General Discussions/@comment-30477336-20170502161821/@comment-4820209-20170502175149

Well, what I'd do is raise questions. Given how their site was created, it would be within their best interests to try and crush competition and spout out the idea that this place is "dead", or not to be used, even if those are either misinformed statements or false, outright.

The idea that it's a "mess" is somewhat humorous. At best the biggest messes here are the infobox issues caused by the firebombing I'm still sorting through (And even then, that's aesthetic. The information isn't compromised). But the information is almost identical to theirs, bar new stuff that's been added since the fork on either side which allows us to differ. Same for false things.

If you were to ask me what to do, I'd say stay, if that's what you refer to. If this place is a so-called "mess", I'd fix it in order to have proper competition, since it breeds improvement which can unarguably only help.

Don't forget, "they" doesn't represent an entire community. While "they" may have moved on, (It's a general minority, mind you, I've been there.) there are still a ton of people who use this site. When they say this site's dead, it shows a dramatic disregard for the users who're here, but just don't talk, or edit. But instead, use the site for what it's meant for, information. I don't think those people deserve to be left in the dust over a minority's decision making process that ended up going very poorly (even with the potentially proper intent), and basically fractured the community to where a big chunk would be neglected if say, you or I stopped working/talking.