Board Thread:Monster Discussions/@comment-7083810-20130517233049/@comment-5234191-20141014222121

See, neither the "bleeding theory" or statement that says Godzilla didn't absorb the plasma beam has sufficient proof to even be compared against the opposing. Even if there's no commentary or claim that say he did absorb it, was there a simmilar info that says the opposite of that? No, and the reason behind not mentioning that fact is probably to surprise the viewer, and later remind them of how did it happen in his previous movies that ultimate beam attack or foreign energy based attacks backfired against the enemies of Godzilla for using it against him, there's more than enough to proof that happened in the video, it happened before, and Godzilla's size change which also was not mentioned along with his enormous arm-amputating bite force, indicates that happened, because absorbing excess energy is the only proof-based explanation from that and the only strain of energy that was apparently there to absorb was Gamera's plasma beam, and we know Godzilla could absorb Plasma now, along with other energy sources like the who-knows-what Gravity beam.

About whether he bleed or not, why would it be Aura? Dramatic reasons? To make viewers guess what's coming?

And why didn't it animated fluidly or fire-like? We don't expect a God of War 3-like animations here, these people didn't even animate Gamera shift to his flying saucer mode on-screen, I wouldn't expect them to do as much as you said, that kind of animation regardless if it matters little to the event or not, takes a lot more of time.

Nor you need to be a genius to see the size difference of Godzilla in the end, you point out something I might overlook like its an odd mistake, but please convince me about this one. And can you screen shot and mark the scars for us? Since I can't watch in a decent graphic quality with my internet. Thank you