Thread:Lt KratosT/@comment-3367060-20131011050909

Posting here so you are sure to get my reply to your comment.

This type of comment seriously can't be appearing on here. I won't thow a "huge fit", though. I'm better than that. I hope you haven't been believing TurokSwe's crap, sir. I'll be quoting what you're saying and replying right under it.

Have you read The Zilla Name Change article? There's TONS of evidence to support the name change. Now, let's dive to your comment, shall we?

"Ok guys, can you handle a little dissent for just a moment and not have a huge fit? Bare with me, because I have to ask a question. Shouldn't you guys be using this picture, shown on the right side of my comment, for the picture of the 'Zilla' artical? Wouldn't make more sense to use a picture of a parody of the Tatopoulos design for Zilla 98 version of Godzilla?"

- You

'''No, we shouldn't be using that picture, because that design is not a parody. It never was. There's NO sources saying that Zilla's inclusion in Final Wars was a parody of anything. Ever.'''

"I understand you guys don't like G98"

- You

'''Sorry, that's false. Who told you that? I shouldn't even have to ask. Zilla is a GREAT character. His movie is debatably bad, and that's it. I am a big fan of Zilla, and if anyone tells you otherwise, they're complete liars.'''

"but just because your strongest piece of evidence for the name change is a quote taken out of context, doesn't necessarily mean the Tatopoulos design is forever 'Zilla'."

- You

'''Have you even read The Zilla Name Change and gone to Penny Blood's website and the Matt Frank DeviantART comment and the Chris Mowry interview? Where is this "quote taken out of context" you're speaking of? Have you even read the interview with Shogo Tomiyama? It's just as out of context as having a Godzilla article on the Godzilla Wiki (which is not out of context at ALL). READ THE ZILLA NAME CHANGE ARTICLE, IT SHOWS ALL OF THIS EVIDENCE (cited with reliable sources, no blog sites or Toho Kingdom or any of that complete bullcrap Swe passes off as "evidence")'''

"The 1998 Godzilla film has been released 2 times since '04. A two-disc DVD set in 2006 and again in 2009 on Blu-Ray. If you check the boxes, the title is still labled, 'Godzilla', and it is still registured as 'Godzilla', on the back of the case in fine print of the copyright/trademark area."

- You

'''We know that. Bringing that up isn't proving anything. Let me spell this out for you loud and clear: Movie titles can't be changed after they have been released, and it's made more impossible for some other company to change the title of a movie they did not produce. ''THAT TRADEMARK HAS BEEN CANCELLED. NOT JUST ABANDONED, CANCELLED SPECIFICALLY BY TOHO. Please read The Zilla Name Change for more info on that. There's LOTS of evidence in that article, not just one "out of context quote". Also, is it just SO impossible for a company to use a defunct trademark in their products? No. It isn't at all. It's very likely TriStar is using that defunct trademark. No, not just likely, but a fact.'''

"Doesn't it make more sense that Toho trademarked a parody character rather than just changing the name?"

- You

''' Actually, it makes LESS sense. Why waste money on owning two different trademarks for the same medium (film, animated series, etc.) for what is the exact same character? It's a complete waste of money. It's much easier to just cancel the first trademark and use the other one.

'''What you are saying here is completely false, and quite blatant misinformation, since it says on the very same copyright disclaimer you're talking about "GODZILLA DESIGN IS OWNED BY TOHO CO. LTD." So no, TriStar owns NOTHING about the "Godzilla 1998" character. NOTHING. Since TriStar owns NOTHING about "Godzilla 1998" (except the film and animated series), Toho would have absolutely nothing to stop them from just taking the design of that character, since it was originally used under the "GODZILLA" name, which Toho clearly owns and has always owned. So there wouldn't be any kind of legal battle whatsoever. It would be like if Honey Nut Cheerios used Tony The Tiger for an ad and then sued Kellog's for trying to use Tony The Tiger again. It's confusing nonsense that Swe ingeniously makes up to confuse people like YOU, and actually make people who believe him dumber.'''

"I'm basing my statements/comments/opinions based on the evidence as I see it."

- You

'''So, you're seeing either NO evidence or Swe's biased, unhelpful, untruthful, and forged "evidence" which it pathetically showers its Wiki over with. DO NOT BELIEVE WHAT TUROKSWE SAYS. Just read The Zilla Name Change, put all the evidence together, then come talk to me so you can be enlightened with truths, facts, and friends. Again, I repeat, do NOT believe in anything TurokSwe says. HE'S the one who takes quotes out of context and such, HE'S the one who rips-off Wikizilla DIRECTLY, HE wants to take the truth down so he can shove his opinions down everyone's, EVERYONE'S throats and basically just enforce his opinions onto everyone so hard that they become facts.'''

Just read The Zilla Name Change, think about all the evidence there, the points I made here, and once you understand, take a look at Swe's biased stuff and laugh at it.

You're welcome in advance. 