Board Thread:Monster Discussions/@comment-10363096-20130414235106/@comment-5808186-20130415094514

Why would Wikipedia be as blind as to merge a creature that is NOT Godzilla  with the King himself? As you stated, in GMK it is mentioned that GINO is not Godzilla. Though coincidentially he bares some resemblences to Godzilla, he is not (he's an entirely seeperate monster right?).

The ORIGINAL Gojira was created in Japan, so how could the Americans graffiti and plagarize him in this way?

I remember reading about an article on Wikipedia on Encyclopedia Dramatica; they too mentioned Wikipedia is full of bias and clearly lack the decency to open their eyes. It seems the wikipedia staff would rather pay attention to "important"/rubbish stuff which is very popular rather than kaiju-related controversies. Kaiju is a genre too and is just as important!

I would like to apologize, because I am a bit in the dark about the whole GINO to American Godzilla controversy. I achknowledge that GINO is not Godzilla (In name only), but with so much going on my brain is starting to slow down. A lot.

When I was young I was a major Gino fan (Junior from the cartoon). In fact I actually thought he was the original Godzilla. I was quite young back then, but when Godzilla: Destroy all Monsters Melee was released I knew then that Gino was not the original.